Clare County Library
Clare Archaeology
Home | Search Library Catalogue | Foto: Clare Photo Collection | OS Maps | Search this Website | Copyright Notice

A Survey of Monuments of Archaeological and Historical Interest in the Barony of Bunratty Lower, Co. Clare by William Gerrard Ryan
 

Part 2: Chapter 18: Tomfinlough Parish: Mooghaun South Townland

Site A: MOOGHAUN HILLFORT
   
6” O.S. Sheet number : 42 (Co. Clare)
Reference : 40.2 cm East; 20.5 cm South
Height : 262.6’ O.D. (Max.) (Nat. Grid Ref.: R409705)
Shape : oval (see site plans and description below)

Description of site:
The purpose of the following illustrated pages of the thesis is to generally record the condition of the above site as it survives to date (1980). I do not propose to enter into a debate as to its function or date. Such discussion may be undertaken at any time. However the site now needs to be more accurately surveyed and recorded particularly in view of the damage being caused by the vegetation covering.

During the course of this description reference will be made to:
a) 1901 site plan by Westropp.
b) Revised 1901 plan, based on field work (1978-1980).
c) Air photo, mid-1960’s.
d) Site photographs, 1980.


During the course of my description of Mooghaun Hillfort reference will be made to the above forest trail. This runs up Mooghaun Hill, to the area of the Trig. Station. The Forestry Service has provided this trail for visitors.

Mooghaun Hillfort

In describing the above site as it survives (1980) I propose to deal with:-
General description of site.
Outer wall and fosse.
Middle wall.
Inner wall.
Discussion on site.

Introduction:
There are only two sites in the 90 plus sq. mile Barony of Bunratty Lower which are national monuments. The first of these is the impressive restored fifteenth century castle at Bunratty. The second is the site under study – Mooghaun Hillfort.

In spite of the latter being deemed of sufficient archaeological interest to be made a national monument one can only, on visiting it, be very disappointed. Certainly it was formerly a very impressive structure with its three high and wide walls enclosing an area of 45 acres. Now, while traces of such an impressive structure are quite clearly to be seen in isolated areas generally speaking it is very difficult to note the original shape and features of the site. Why is this the case? Due entirely to the depth of the vegetation cover. Here we are not only faced with the problems of briars and bushes, which were encountered at so many other sites during the fieldwork associated with the thesis, but also many young and mature trees. Their presence has made a thorough examination of the site impossible. Certainly one can follow sections of the stone walls associated with the site but not one of the three main walls can be followed along its full course. Such a covering is not a recent feature of the hillfort as we read:-

“…Parts of the wall can only be examined by creeping through thickets of sloe and other bushes; and the luxuriant bracken, if a less painful, is still an even more concealing obstacle to our labours…” Westropp, 1908, page 221.

During the 1960’s attempts were made to reduce, if not fully clear, the depth of the vegetation covering over this site. Various chemicals were spread and these certainly killed off the lighter covering. For a time, it would appear, the three walls could be followed along their full course. The aerial photograph provided in the thesis (below) dates to this time. In it one will see a very light covering over most of the site, with traces of the walls and two later stoneforts quite plainly visible. Such a photograph is useful in collaboration with various plans prepared by the O.S. and Westropp (1893, 1901). Unfortunately when the covering recommenced its vigorous growth over the past 15 years no further attempts were made to stop it. The site is now, as stated previously, quite heavily overgrown.

Should one intend visiting the site I would suggest February, before the seasonal (heavy) vegetation has had an opportunity to grow. Certainly visits at the height of summer are almost useless, in relation to a detailed examination of the hillfort.

Mooghaun Hillfort (Revised 1901 plan)

Outer Wall and Fosse:
During fieldwork at this site I found it possible to examine three sections of this outermost wall. Such sections, to the a) south b) east and c) west are represented on the above plan.

Southern Part of Outer Wall:
The Forestry and Wildlife Service have, since 1978, opened up a car park – picnic site in an area a short distance south/south-west of Mooghaun Hillfort. This surfaced area, which is signposted from the village of Newmarket-on-Fergus, is in Langough Wood (Co. Clare 6” sheet number 42; Reference: 41.8 cm East; 17.3 cm South). From this area a woodland trail leads towards the nearby hillfort. After a short distance, during which one crosses a larger forest trail, you reach the southern slope of Mooghaun Hill (262.6’ O.D.). Going up a well defined pathway one reaches, after a distance of only some 40 metres, trace of the outer wall of the hillfort. The trail from here north to the trigonometrical point on the hill’s summit is all within the actual site.

Standing at the point where the forest trail cuts the outer wall one will notice some evidence of such a wall to the east and west.

Evidence of Outer Wall, to the West (left) of main Forest Trail:
Trace of the wall can only be followed along a 30 metre stretch in this area, after which distance the wall foundations become heavily covered in moss and by trees. In this part of the site one will only find traces of the wall foundation, much of the stone was presumably removed and used in the erection of some of the many stone walls nearby, associated with Dromoland demesne. As it survives to date (1980) this outer wall averages 4 metres in width by ½ metre high from upslope but 2 to 2 ½ metres high downslope. The marked differences in height (c. 2 metres) are not, as one may understand, because of the condition of the wall but rather are due to the steep slope of the terrain. The actual wall in this 30 metre long area, west (left) of the forest trail, consists of loose grey limestone blocks with no trace of facings.

As stated previously continued movement along this area was rendered impossible because of the vegetation covering (refer to Photo 1, below).

Evidence of the Outer wall to the right (east) of the main Forest Trail:
This wall can also be followed to the right (east) of the trail but only for a 25 metre distance. Though one can actually walk along the wall foundations all the stones are heavily covered by moss. Again the presence of many young trees restricts continued movement (refer to Photo 2, below).

Measurements for the outer wall in this area are similar to those in the nearby area to the west. The foundations average 4 to 5 metres in width, ½ to 1 metre high (upslope) and 2 to 3 metres high (downslope). Such measurements suggest quite impressive wall foundations but because of the stated moss and general vegetation covering this was anything but the case.

Reference has been made previously to the existence of a “fosse”. Such a feature seems out of place at a site of this nature, built as it is around a craggy hill. However certainly a fosse and outer wall existed and trace of this is quite clear immediately below that section of the outer wall described previously. Here along a 16 metre stretch to the south is a fosse, cut in the limestone. Its measurements centred on 3 ½ metres in width by 1 to 1 ½ metres in depth. The outer wall could also be traced along part of this area and averaged ½ metre high by 1 metre wide. Though now overgrown this outer wall was presumably built of stone which was so readily available in this craggy outcropping area.

Unfortunately further field work in the vegetation covered eastern and western areas failed to find further evidence of either the fosse or outer wall.

Eastern Part of Outer Wall:
The relevant 6” O.S. sheet shows a minor road running along the eastern side of this site. Along this road is a marked bend or turn. In this area it is possible to examine part of Mooghaun Hillfort by climbing in over the estate wall. The most advantageous time for such an examination would be January – February before the very heavy seasonal growth has commenced. Field work found trace of the outer wall though unfortunately such evidence was largely covered by moss. (No trace could be found of the fosse but perhaps such a feature was not cut here due to the marked slope). The wall foundation averaged 3 ½ - 4 metres in width but only ½ metre in height. There is quite a marked slope from here up to the middle wall.

Western Area of the Outer Wall:
In recent years the Forest and Wildlife Service have opened up a number of new forest trails through the site. One of these leads from the trigonometrical station (262.6’ O.D.) on the hill summit to the outer wall area to the north-west, in the vicinity of a later stonefort (Site B). Though reference will be made to this site at a later stage here it will be sufficient to say that the stonefort has a heavily overgrown interior which completely restricts movement. A forest trail leads south from here eventually reaching a much wider forest route. However while walking along the narrow trail one comes across traces of the hillfort’s outer wall, especially to the south-west. The stone wall here averages 3 to 4 metres in width by ½ to 1 metre high (upslope) and 1 to 1 ½ metres high downslope. Again most of the loose limestone blocks are moss covered and have no features of particular interest.

The Outer Wall – A Conclusion:
According to Westropp (1908) this outer wall enclosed an oval shaped area 1512 ft. (435.45 metres) north-south by 1118 ft. (322 metres) east-west. The area within such a wall is over 45 acres in extent. The actual circumference of the outer stonewall is 4,550 ft. or 1,311.4 metres (Westropp, 1893).

Middle Wall:
Reference has previously been made to the existence of a north-south running forest trail which enables one to reach the trigonometrical station on the summit of Mooghaun Hill (see revised 1901 site plan). Trace of the outer wall was visible to the east and west of this trail, at point A. on the revised (1901) site plan. Continuing almost 100 metres further up along this track one comes across trace of the site’s middle stonewall (see B. on revised site plan).

Though many young trees grow to the right (east) of this trail it is still possible to follow the middle wall for quite a long distance (refer to Photo 3, below). At a point 50 metres east of the trail, for example, one finds that the wall is 6 to 7 metres wide, due to its crumbled state, and 1 to 1 ½ metres high on average. Because of the sloping nature of the ground the wall foundations are only ½ to 1 metre high upslope by 1 to 2 metres high downslope. Though the terrain slopes it is not as marked as that to the south-east, by the outer wall area.

After the 50 metre break one can follow this middle wall eastwards for a further long distance until one is some 120 metres from the forest trail. Up to this point the stonewall has been easy to follow and it is partly free of moss, unlike the wall below it at a lower level (outer wall). At this 120 metre point the vegetation covering gets quite heavy and this, along with collapsed trees, makes further movement very difficult. One cannot examine the features of the middle wall in any detail along this 30 metre stretch. Fortunately the covering gets lighter and one can again examine the wall foundations in some detail. The most interesting point about this next 45 metre long section is the nature of the downslope drop. There is a sharp drop of some 20 metres downslope at an angle of, at least, 60º. Many of the stones from the middle wall have collapsed and can be easily followed down this slope (refer to Photo 4, below).

Continued movement along this stretch of the middle wall is impossible because of the vegetation covering. However at this point, see the revised 1901 plan, one can see traces of the upper wall, at a distance of only 25 metres upslope. Climbing up and over this top wall one can find further evidence of the Middle wall to the north-east. However for continued study of this centre wall of the hillfort one should follow the recently opened minor forest trail to the north-west of the trig. point. After cutting across trace of the upper wall this trail reaches the impressive grey limestone foundation blocks of the middle wall (see revised 1902 site plan). At a gap in the wall (modern?) one can follow this middle wall to the north-east or south.

Going along the middle wall foundations to the north-east one has an impressive view of Mooghaun Tower House to the west, along with the gently undulating lands of Dromoland estate. Along this stretch movement is easy as the wall is vegetation free. On average the foundations, now in a crumbled state, are 6 to 8 metres wide and 1 ½ metres above the immediate upslope level while 2 ½ metres above the downslope level. As one reaches the northern area of the site continued movement becomes impossible due to the nature of the vegetation covering. The foundation blocks, which were formerly vegetation clear, are now heavily covered by moss.

What about this middle stonewall to the south of the previously mentioned gap? This wall can fortunately be followed along its full stretch until one reaches again the forest trail at Point B (see revised 1901 site plan).

The first 30 metres section of this middle wall is very impressive and clear of vegetation. It averages 8 to 10 metres in width by 1 ½ metres high upslope and 2 to 3 metres high immediately downslope, due to the sloping nature of the terrain. From here one has an impressive view towards the Fergus estuary, to the west. The next 40 metre stretch has a very steep drop, downslope. Here there is an immediate sharp drop of 10 to 15 metres, with much wall collapse along this slope.

The next section is now quite unimpressive after the previously described area. In the place of wide crumbling walls we have a 30 metre gap with little trace existing of this middle wall. What foundation stones occur are very low and moss covered. At first it seems unclear why this section of the wall should be so poorly represented, that is until one comes to the nearby stonefort (Site C). Obviously the readily available stones were removed at a later stage and used in the erection of this stonefort which, as we shall note later, is in quite a good condition. That short section of the middle wall between the stonefort and forest trail, at Point B, is short and poorly defined.

The Middle Wall – A Conclusion:
According to Westropp (1908) this middle or centre wall encloses an area 705 ft. (203 metres) north-south by 664 ft. (191.2 metres) east-west. The actual circumference of the wall is 2,200 ft. or 633.3 metres (Westropp, 1893).

Inner or Top Wall:
As mentioned on a number of occasions the summit of Mooghaun Hill has a concrete trigonometrical station (262.6 ft. O.D.) used by the O.S. in surveying the country. There is a path leading to the east of this which, after a short distance, brings one to traces of the inner wall (Point D on revised 1901 site plan). At this point, a 3 metre wide gap in the actual stonewall, one can either examine traces of the wall to the north-west or south-west.

That section of the inner wall to the south-west of the above mentioned gap (c. on revised site plan) can be clearly traced for a 25 metre stretch. Along here the wall foundations are quite impressive with an average width of some 7 metres though the original would have been closer to 4 metres. The grey limestone foundation blocks are clear of all vegetation (unfortunately seasonal growth covers much of it during the summer) and the steep nature of the slope down to the previously described middle wall is quite impressive here. Much of this slope is in fact covered by collapse from the inner wall (refer to Photo 5).

Unfortunately this section of the inner wall can not be followed to the point where it meets the main forest trail at Point C (revised 1901 plan). This is due to the nature of the permanent vegetation cover which completely restricts movement along a 35 – 40 metre stretch. This in fact is the only part of the inner wall that can not be examined.

What are the features of this inner wall to the north-west of the previously mentioned eastern gap (Point D on revised site plan)? The first section of this is partly covered by light vegetation, with a moss covering over many of the stones. Fortunately this is a short section and one can again examine the wall foundations in adequate detail to the north. Here the inner wall foundations average 7 to 8 metres in width by ½ to 1 metre high (upslope) and 2 to 2 ½ metres high downslope. The vegetation covering to the north of this wall is quite heavy and such a covering has hindered examination of the two lower walls to the north. As one moves to the north-west this inner wall again becomes more difficult to follow, with the vegetation and moss covering getting heavier. Fortunately this stretch only lasts for 20 metres after which one comes to an open, largely vegetation free, area. This section stretches for some 50 metres and from it one has a clear view of the middle wall below one with Mooghaun Tower House in the distance (west) (refer to Photo 6, below). In this area the top wall of the hillfort averages 6 to 7 metres in width by c. 1 metre high (upslope) and 2 to 2 ½ metres high downslope.

The final part of the inner wall, heading south-east towards the forest trail at C (revised 1902 plan), is quite difficult to follow. It is quite heavily covered by vegetation and movement through it is very slow and quite difficult. In places the visible wall foundation is only 2 metres wide and covered by moss. The drop in slope is quite marked here and below one – between the trees – is later stonefort C. A short distance beyond this is the forest trail.

The Inner Wall – A Conclusion:
The 1908 article by Westropp gives this top wall enclosing an oval shaped area 363 ft. (104.5 metres) north-south by 386 ft. (110.3 metres) east-west. The actual circumference of the wall is 1,100 ft. or 317 metres (Westropp, 1893).

Mooghaun Hillfort – A Conclusion:
The previous pages of the thesis, along with the revised 1901 revised site plan, will give one some fair idea as to the present (1980) condition of this formerly impressive site. The air photo and general photographs of the hillfort should clearly illustrate what has been said in the written section.

How would one define a hillfort? The usual type of definition says that it is a hill site, the defences of which followed the contour lines. An examination of the relevant 6” O.S. sheet will show that, allowing for slight variations due to steep slopes, the site on Mooghaun Hill can rightly be regarded as a probable Iron Age hillfort. The actual erection of such an impressive structure was a truly tremendous achievement.

Consider the organisation required to quarry, transport and erect the three lines of defensive walls. Without doubt the group involved must have had considerable wealth and power to support such an undertaking. Consider the work involved now to erect a 4 to 5 metre wide, perhaps 3 to 4 metre high and, in all, 2,262 metre long dry stone wall. Indeed it would be a most difficult job – but such work was done perhaps over 2,000 years ago without the use of modern technology and equipment. Mooghaun Hillfort is truly a magnificent monument to, and achievement of, a long past people.

REFERENCES TO MOOGHAUN HILLFORT

Westropp, T.J., 1893, “Prehistoric Stone Forts of Central Clare, Moghane and Langough, near Dromoland”
J.R.S.A.I., Series 5, Volume 3, Pages 281 – 284 (inclusive).
  1900 – 1902, “The Cahers of County Clare”,
P.R.I.A. Series 3, Volume 6, Pages 440 & 441.
  1908, “Types of the Ringforts and Similar Structures Remaining in Eastern Clare (The Newmarket Group)”, P.R.I.A., Volume 27,
Section C, Pages 221 – 225 (inclusive).
  1920, “Finds near Newmarket, Co. Clare”,
J.R.S.A.I., Series 6, Volume 10, Pages 181 – 182.

Mooghaun Hillfort: Arial Photograph
Mooghaun Hillfort: Arial Photograph

Photo 1: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo of part of the outer wall, to the west of the forest trail. The heavy vegetation covering stopped further movement in this area
Photo 1: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo of part of the outer wall, to the west of the forest trail.
The heavy vegetation covering stopped further movement in this area

Photo 2: Mooghaun Hillfort: This photo shows the outer wall to the east of the forest trail. The vegetation covering again restricts movement
Photo 2: Mooghaun Hillfort: This photo shows the outer wall to the east of the forest trail.
The vegetation covering again restricts movement

Photo 3: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo of the middle wall, to the east of the forest trail. This wall can be followed for quite a distance (refer to revised 1901 plan)
Photo 3: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo of the middle wall, to the east of the forest trail.
This wall can be followed for quite a distance (refer to revised 1901 plan)

Photo 4: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo from the middle wall, to the south-east (downslope). It shows one the nature of slope and traces of the collapsed middle wall
Photo 4: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo from the middle wall, to the south-east (downslope).
It shows one the nature of slope and traces of the collapsed middle wall

Photo 5: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo of the collapsed nature of the top wall to the immediate east of the Trig. Station
Photo 5: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo of the collapsed nature
of the top wall to the immediate east of the Trig. Station

Photo 6: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo from the top (inner) wall towards the north-west. A part of the middle wall is visible, along with Mooghaun Tower House
Photo 6: Mooghaun Hillfort: Photo from the top (inner) wall towards the north-west.
A part of the middle wall is visible, along with Mooghaun Tower House

 

Previous

Main

Next